Betting Limits Ratings

Bettor ratings for maximum stakes and how a bookmaker treats winning accounts.

Based on feedback collected from bettors · Last updated: Nov 6, 2026

51 bookmakers sorted by
Rating Alphabetical order
21–40 of 51
№ Bookmaker Betting limits Compared to average Action
21
Sky Bet
3.7 21 ratings +3% above average (3.6) Review
22
partypoker
3.7 11 ratings +3% above average (3.6) Review
23
SBOBET
3.5 22 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
24
Gamebookers
3.5 21 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
25
BetClic
3.5 19 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
26
DOXXbet
3.5 17 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
27
Goalbet
3.5 11 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
28
PlanetOfBets
3.5 11 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
29
Smarkets
3.5 11 ratings −5% below average (3.6) Review
30
888 Sport
3.4 23 ratings −8% below average (3.6) Review
31
NetBet
3.4 14 ratings −8% below average (3.6) Review
32
Tipico
3.4 14 ratings −8% below average (3.6) Review
33
BetVictor
3.3 28 ratings −11% below average (3.6) Review
34
Sportingbet
3.3 26 ratings −11% below average (3.6) Review
35
Boylesports
3.3 19 ratings −11% below average (3.6) Review
36
Betsson
3.3 18 ratings −11% below average (3.6) Review
37
NordicBet
3.3 18 ratings −11% below average (3.6) Review
38
Unibet
3.2 34 ratings −14% below average (3.6) Review
39
Ladbrokes
3.2 25 ratings −14% below average (3.6) Review
40
GoldBet
3.2 17 ratings −14% below average (3.6) Review

Betting Limits Ratings

A limit that is published is a product decision; a limit applied quietly after a winning run is a different thing entirely. This table collects bettor feedback on both the headline maximum stake and the way limits are applied in practice.

Expect the strongest scores from bookmakers that state their limits up front and keep them stable, and the weakest from those where accounts are restricted without notice after a few profitable weeks.

How to read this table

  • Stated maximum stakes differ by market and by sport, so the score describes the practical experience rather than a single published number.
  • A lower score does not mean a bookmaker cannot be used for casual betting; it usually means sharp or high-volume bettors were restricted.

Table legend

Betting limits
Average score for this criterion, on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0, with the number of ratings behind it.
Compared to average
The gap between this bookmaker and the mean score of 3.6 across every bookmaker rated for this criterion.
Action
Review opens the full written review, including licensing, payments and markets.

Other rating tables