Safety and Fairness Ratings

Bettor ratings for fair terms, honest markets and how disputes are resolved.

Based on feedback collected from bettors · Last updated: Nov 6, 2026

55 bookmakers sorted by 1–20 of 55
№ Bookmaker Safety and fairness Compared to average Action
1 5.0 67 ratings +43% above average (3.4) Review
2 5.0 25 ratings +43% above average (3.4) Review
3 5.0 23 ratings +43% above average (3.4) Review
4 4.9 11 ratings +40% above average (3.4) Review
5 4.7 85 ratings +34% above average (3.4) Review
6 4.6 73 ratings +31% above average (3.4) Review
7 4.6 19 ratings +31% above average (3.4) Review
8 4.6 14 ratings +31% above average (3.4) Review
9 4.5 10 ratings +28% above average (3.4) Review
10 4.3 11 ratings +23% above average (3.4) Review
11 4.1 13 ratings +17% above average (3.4) Review
12 3.8 89 ratings +9% above average (3.4) Review
13 3.8 33 ratings +9% above average (3.4) Review
14 3.8 27 ratings +9% above average (3.4) Review
15 3.7 15 ratings +6% above average (3.4) Review
16 3.6 24 ratings +3% above average (3.4) Review
17 3.5 22 ratings +3% above average (3.4) Review
18 3.5 22 ratings +3% above average (3.4) Review
19 3.5 17 ratings +3% above average (3.4) Review
20 3.5 10 ratings +3% above average (3.4) Review

Safety and Fairness Ratings

Fairness is harder to measure than speed or payout, because it shows up in the exceptions: a bet voided on a technicality, a bonus term applied narrowly, an account limited without explanation. This table aggregates those experiences into a score.

A high score here does not mean a bookmaker never makes an unpopular decision. It means that when bettors describe how they were treated, the account is generally one of published rules applied consistently.

How to read this table

  • Read this alongside the licensing column: a bookmaker operating under a regulator with a real dispute process gives bettors a route that a licence of convenience does not.
  • Scores are aggregated from bettor feedback and are not adjusted by commercial arrangements.

Table legend

Safety and fairness
Average score for this criterion, on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0, with the number of ratings behind it.
Compared to average
The gap between this bookmaker and the mean score of 3.4 across every bookmaker rated for this criterion.
Action
Review opens the full written review, including licensing, payments and markets.

Other rating tables